Alessi 21
(MWSC 1137; FoF 2410; CMa00)
0.98
UTI
0.89
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
15.5 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.89 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Alessi 21 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 107.663 | -9.4 | 1.741 | -5.486 | 2.626 | 38.321 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 107.69 | -9.363 | 1.72 | -5.475 | 2.602 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 107.693 | -9.506 | 1.762 | -5.523 | 2.669 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 107.711 | -9.396 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 107.75 | -9.622 | 1.699 | -5.482 | 2.685 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 107.592 | -9.318 | 1.744 | -5.501 | 2.653 | 37.491 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 107.723 | -9.577 | 1.746 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 107.592 | -9.318 | 1.744 | -5.501 | 2.653 | 37.491 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 107.723 | -9.389 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 107.663 | -9.298 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 107.685 | -9.369 | 1.758 | -5.534 | 2.647 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 107.725 | -9.387 | 1.76 | -5.481 | 2.684 | â |
| Santos-Silva et al. | 2021 | 107.7 | -9.36 | 1.73 | -5.52 | 2.59 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 107.711 | -9.396 | 1.718 | -5.498 | 2.587 | 41.454 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 107.69 | -9.363 | 1.72 | -5.475 | 2.602 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 107.69 | -9.363 | 1.72 | -5.475 | 2.602 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 107.671 | -9.488 | 1.769 | -5.498 | 2.644 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 107.69 | -9.363 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 107.69 | -9.363 | â | â | â | 41.85 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 107.69 | -9.363 | 1.72 | -5.475 | 2.602 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 107.7 | -9.337 | â | 3.473 | -1.3 | 38.8 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 107.663 | -9.298 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 107.696 | -9.337 | â | 0.13 | -1.09 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 107.67 | -9.3 | â | -3.55 | 2.95 | 38.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 107.696 | -9.337 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 107.694 | -9.341 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 107.7 | -9.34 | â | 0.5 | â | 38.8 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 107.694 | -9.341 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 107.7 | -9.34 | â | -3.65 | 3.04 | 38.8 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 107.696 | -9.337 | â | -4.0 | 2.8 | 38.8 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.57 | 0.26 | 0.75 | 59 | 0.000 | 279 | 0.48 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.63 | 0.26 | â | 59 | 0.249 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 0.61 | 0.26 | â | 59 | 0.250 | 493 | 0.43 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.57 | 0.37 | â | 88 | â | 288 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.59 | 0.29 | â | 60 | -0.006 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 362(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.60 | 0.21 | â | 62 | 0.440 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.55 | 0.15 | 0.75 | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.56 | 0.37 | â | 100 | -0.048 | 386(1) | 0.53 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 50 | â | 36 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.40 | â | 45 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.58 | â | â | 69 | â | â | â | â |
| Santos-Silva et al. | 2021 | 0.57(1) | 0.34(1) | â | 85(1) | 0.000(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.57 | 0.37 | â | 88 | -0.006 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.59 | 0.29 | â | 66 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 50 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.53 | 0.25 | â | 65 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.80 | 0.32 | â | 21 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.60 | 0.23 | â | 50 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.60 | 0.23 | â | 50 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.50 | â | â | 30 | â | 257 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.50 | 0.22 | â | 30 | â | 270(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.50 | 0.22 | â | 30 | â | 134 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.50 | 0.22 | â | 30 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.50 | 0.22 | â | 30 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.