Alessi 19
(MWSC 2887; LeDrew 5)
0.95
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
6.1 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Alessi 19 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 274.775 | 12.228 | 1.708 | -0.987 | -7.107 | -8.352 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 274.741 | 12.311 | 1.71 | -1.005 | -7.073 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 274.817 | 12.504 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 274.827 | 12.267 | 1.676 | -1.007 | -7.063 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 274.534 | 11.897 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 274.534 | 11.897 | 1.709 | -1.009 | -7.074 | -7.866 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 274.741 | 12.311 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 274.845 | 12.418 | 1.71 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 274.534 | 11.897 | 1.709 | -1.009 | -7.074 | -7.866 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 274.776 | 12.194 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 274.666 | 11.976 | 1.691 | -1.0 | -7.18 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 274.817 | 12.504 | 1.713 | -1.012 | -7.051 | -47.055 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 274.741 | 12.311 | 1.71 | -1.005 | -7.073 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 274.741 | 12.311 | 1.71 | -1.005 | -7.073 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 274.741 | 12.311 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 274.741 | 12.311 | â | â | â | -4.51 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 274.734 | 12.203 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 274.741 | 12.311 | 1.71 | -1.005 | -7.073 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 274.62 | 12.167 | â | 0.42 | -6.56 | -5.1 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 274.776 | 12.194 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 274.617 | 12.167 | â | -0.59 | 0.37 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 274.782 | 12.195 | â | 1.04 | -6.35 | -5.1 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 274.616 | 12.167 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 274.766 | 12.177 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 274.62 | 12.17 | â | 0.75 | â | -5.1 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 274.766 | 12.177 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 274.6 | 12.025 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 274.77 | 12.18 | â | -0.47 | -6.97 | -5.1 |
| Alessi et al. | 2003 | 274.6 | 12.025 | â | 0.4 | -6.6 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 274.617 | 12.167 | â | 0.42 | -6.56 | 7.73 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.57 | 0.14 | 0.95 | 79 | 0.065 | 159 | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.57 | 0.28 | â | 72 | 0.139 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.57 | 0.41 | â | 58 | â | 159 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.57 | 0.31 | â | 46 | 0.129 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.004(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 73(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 26 | â | 126 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.63 | 0.63 | â | 17 | -0.030 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.57 | 0.34 | 0.95 | 37 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 79 | â | 41 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.30 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.57 | 0.41 | â | 58 | 0.129 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.57 | 0.31 | â | 26 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.57 | 0.16 | â | 24 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.45 | 0.12 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.55 | 0.12 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.55 | 0.12 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.55 | â | â | 100 | â | 1202 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.55 | 0.12 | â | 112 | â | 1309(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.55 | 0.12 | â | 112 | â | 632 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.55 | 0.12 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.55 | 0.12 | â | 112 | â | â | â | â |
| Alessi et al. | 2003 | 0.55 | 0.09 | â | 158 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.55 | 0.12 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.