Alessi 18

(MWSC 1284; DSH J0737.1-2623)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.46 UTI
0.0
CN
0.8
Cdens
0.12
CC3
0.69
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 4.0 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 0.8 Dense
  • CC3 0.12 Very low quality
  • Clit 0.69 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Alessi 18 is a sparse, dense object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very large* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~10.05 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~6.29 kpc).

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 114.296 -26.39 0.1 -1.267 1.883 124.549
Almeida et al. 2025 114.295 -26.39 – – – –
Celli et al. 2024 114.296 -26.388 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 114.286 -26.383 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 114.295 -26.39 0.131 -1.221 1.886 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 114.295 -26.386 0.126 -1.261 1.79 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 114.295 -26.386 0.126 -1.261 1.79 –
Bica et al. 2019 114.29 -26.388 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 114.295 -26.386 0.126 -1.261 1.79 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 114.286 -26.383 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 114.292 -26.385 – -3.65 1.48 –
Kronberger et al. 2006 114.296 -26.388 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 114.296 -26.388 – -1.39 -0.34 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 6.29 2.02 – 841 -0.272 311 – –
Almeida et al. 2025 4.05 2.04 – 659 – 270 – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 5 – 311 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 1023 – 438 – –
Dias et al. 2021 4.05 2.04 – 659 -0.272 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 7.21 2.48 – 5 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 6.46 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 6.46 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 6.29 2.00 – 1023 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 6.29 2.00 – 1023 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 6.29 2.00 – 1023 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸