Alessi 18
(MWSC 1284; DSH J0737.1-2623)
0.46
UTI
0.0
CN
0.8
Cdens
0.12
CC3
0.69
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
4.0 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.0 Sparse
- Cdens 0.8 Dense
- CC3 0.12 Very low quality
- Clit 0.69 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Alessi 18 is a sparse, dense object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very large* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
(*): The parallax distance estimate (~10.05 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~6.29 kpc).
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 114.296 | -26.39 | 0.1 | -1.267 | 1.883 | 124.549 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 114.295 | -26.39 | â | â | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 114.296 | -26.388 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 114.286 | -26.383 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 114.295 | -26.39 | 0.131 | -1.221 | 1.886 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 114.295 | -26.386 | 0.126 | -1.261 | 1.79 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 114.295 | -26.386 | 0.126 | -1.261 | 1.79 | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 114.29 | -26.388 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 114.295 | -26.386 | 0.126 | -1.261 | 1.79 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 114.286 | -26.383 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 114.292 | -26.385 | â | -3.65 | 1.48 | â |
| Kronberger et al. | 2006 | 114.296 | -26.388 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 114.296 | -26.388 | â | -1.39 | -0.34 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 6.29 | 2.02 | â | 841 | -0.272 | 311 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.05 | 2.04 | â | 659 | â | 270 | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 5 | â | 311 | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1023 | â | 438 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.05 | 2.04 | â | 659 | -0.272 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 7.21 | 2.48 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 6.46 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 6.46 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 6.29 | 2.00 | â | 1023 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 6.29 | 2.00 | â | 1023 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 6.29 | 2.00 | â | 1023 | â | â | â | â |
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.